On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Ortner <christophortn...@gmail.com> wrote: > ah - extremely embarrassing mistake. Thank you. > > So was funA the "correct" way to implement this?
IIRC, currently `a[:]` gets lowered to `a[1:endof(a)]` (see `expand(:(a[:]))`) so this won't work for get/set index. (I remember there's a PR about this lowering, maybe it will change soon?) But IMHO it is the right way if you want to dispatch on `:` in a function in general. > > Christoph > >
