There are no plans to drop |> from being parsed entirely – it's a useful operator. There has been some talk about making it more than just an normal infix operator:
- https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/554 - https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/5571 - https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/11608 But there's far from consensus on that. I have no special knowledge of how that discussion is going to turn out. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > > right, but things like that need special support in the language parser (i > believe), so if the command is being dropped, maybe it is also being > dropped form the parser? > > andrew > > On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 14:11:35 UTC-3, Yichao Yu wrote: > >> On 2015年6月9日 星期二 10:00:23, andrew cooke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > huh. and what exactly is deprecated? just the associated function, or >> the >> > symbol too? in the next version, will it still be possible to define a >> > meaning for |> ? >> >> The use of it to pipe commands together >> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/base/deprecated.jl#L205 >> >> > >> > On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 13:26:05 UTC-3, Simon Frost wrote: >> > > Dear All, >> > > >> > > I tried (and failed) to search for this, but I wanted to know why the >> > > forward pipe operator |> has been deprecated in favour of >> pipe(...,...,)? >> > > >> > > Best wishes, >> > > Simon >> >
