It is a very strong convention, though. -- John
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:52:01 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: > > Definitely not a requirement, just convention. > > If there are other proposals out there I'm happy to entertain them. > > On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 1:51:07 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: >> >> Does atom require you to name the repository language-julia? I'm >> generally in favor of your plan here but maybe a more specific repo name >> would be clearer, if that's possible? >> >> >> On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 10:33:45 AM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote: >>> >>> Right now the atom package for adding syntax highlighting for Julia is >>> https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia >>> >>> Based on issues like this one ( >>> https://github.com/tpoisot/language-julia/issues/8) it seems like the >>> grammar.cson is incorrect. >>> >>> I did a fresh restart of the grammar based on the official text mate >>> bundle https://github.com/JuliaLang/Julia.tmbundle and all these issues >>> seem to be resolved. It is a relief to not have syntax highlighting treat >>> everything as a string mid-file! >>> >>> I've also added everything in Base.REPLCompletions.latex_symbols >>> and Base.REPLCompletions.emoji_symbols as snippets. >>> >>> I'm writing here to propose two things: >>> >>> 1. Contact the maintainer of the current language-julia atom package, >>> merge in the new features he has added, and begin using the new one >>> generated from the tmBundle as the official Julia support for atom >>> 2. To make it seem more "official" I would like house the repository >>> under the JuliaLang github organization in a repo JuliaLang/language-julia. >>> >>> What do people think about this idea? >>> >>
