Hello colleague, you already gave the answer yourself:
*Because all the programs that i implement are faster in Matlab than in Julia.* you just need to write faster julia programs (OK, that's not very helpful...). Although there are fast and slow computers there isn't the equivalent of fast or slow programming languages. Julia isn't a one2one matlab replacement with different speed, it's a completly different approach to write efficient programms. In Matlab a lot of implict computing (and implicit loops) is done by calling library functions (with matrices and other 'big' data fields) while in julia a lot of explicit loops and operations are favoured. See http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.3/manual/noteworthy-differences/ and http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.3/manual/performance-tips/#man-performance-tips My personal oppinion is (because i'm doing very efficient computing in Matlab) that the Julia = incredible speed is a little bit overhyped. Julia gives you the control to write fast programs, but it cannot do the job for you. On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 10:01:12 AM UTC+2, Lytu wrote: > > Hello Julia users, > > I have a question. Did anyone notice that Julia is less faster than Matlab > or it's only me that have noticed this. > Can anyone please tell me why Julia is not as faster as they claim ? > Because all the programs that i implement are faster in Matlab than in > Julia. > > Thank you >
