Waiting for your comments, over 
at https://github.com/lindahua/Formatting.jl/issues/8!

On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:22:04 PM UTC-4, Tom Breloff wrote:
>
> Yes it was on julia-dev.  Regardless I think the right path forward is to 
> start a discussion on github (in Formatting.jl) and we could hash out 
> exactly what would be nice for users.  Based on your posts, you may have a 
> very different perspective on string formatting that your average 
> developer/scientist.  My goal would be to have methods that are extremely 
> simple to understand and super short to write, so that people actually use 
> them.  Bonus points if those methods are flexible enough for those that 
> need additional options.  Anyways... over to github?
>
> On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:07:21 PM UTC-4, Scott Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>> I was aware that it could be any or all of those issues.  I was just 
>> stating the facts, not complaining.
>>
>> Here is what I sent him:
>>
>>> Hi, I hope you don’t mind a direct e-mail.
>>> I was pointed at your Formatting.jl package, after I’d made the 
>>> suggestion of adding a fmt function in a new package,
>>> and kmsquire pointed out that there was already a Formatting.jl package, 
>>> which is where it should go, and then
>>> when I investigated, I saw that it had a fmt function that was almost 
>>> exactly what I was suggesting.
>>> I was wondering what you’d think of me adding my idea (renamed possibly 
>>> `sfmt` to avoid the naming conflict`) to your very
>>> nice package (which I think should be in Base, instead of so much 
>>> *unused* stuff like “RopeString” ;-) ).
>>> My idea was the following:
>>> sfmt( value [, format [, format arguments] ] )
>>> The reason to have the value first, is that you could have methods added 
>>> to have a default format for specific types.
>>> For example, the C sprintf(buf, “%*s”, 8, string) would become something 
>>> like:
>>> sfmt( string, “*s”, 8)
>>> What do you think?
>>> Thanks, Scott
>>
>>    
>> As I said, his formatting package does seem very nice, and very complete 
>> as well...
>> [OT: Will he be coming to JuliaCon?  I hope so!]
>>
>> On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:00:20 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>>>
>>> Dahua is pretty busy and lives in a very different time zone. He also 
>>> may not want to respond to direct messages.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Scott Jones <scott.pa...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I tried directly e-mailing him (after having gotten a lot of grief for 
>>>> posting so much!), but I haven't heard back...
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to