Thanks - I neglected to put in the issue I created.
This question is somewhat unrelated to the lack of Compat support, though.
Have the Julia Experts (tm) decided on a preferred constructor? I'm
assuming it's Vector{Int}()but then it seems weird that it's (still) a
breaking change. If one were to go strictly on availability of
cross-version support, one might assume Int[] would be the "go-forward" way
of doing things.
I just want to avoid, as much as possible, future deprecations in my code.
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 10:51:45 AM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> Cross-reference: https://github.com/JuliaLang/Compat.jl/issues/105
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Seth <[email protected]
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I note that Int[] works in 0.3 and 0.4, but Vector{Int}() and
>> Array{Int,1}() were introduced at some point in 0.4 (but this syntax
>> hasn't been backported or Compat'ed for 0.3 - I have an issue open for
>> that). Going forward, what's the recommended way to do this? (Am I missing
>> another constructor?)
>>
>
>
