Matt's been busy fixing all the things lately :)

On Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 6:55:53 PM UTC-4, andrew cooke wrote:
>
>
> i am now back from my trip and have returned to this (i did try to look 
> while away, but it seems that it was only on one of my machines - the one 
> turned off and hidden from burglars in the closet - that was affected).  
> anyway, pulling from git and rebuilding julia fixed the issue - it's now 
> back to 9 allocations (256 bytes) instead of 300,000,000 allocations (4578 
> MB).
>
> thanks,
> andrew
>
>
> On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 10:10:52 UTC-3, andrew cooke wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is it the current poor performance / allocation a known issue?
>>
>> I don't know how long this has been going on, and searching for 
>> "performance" in issues gives a lot of hits, but I've been maintaining some 
>> old projects and noticed that timed tests are running significant;y slower 
>> with trunk than 0.3.  CRC.jl was 40x slower - I ended up cancelling the 
>> Travis build, and assumed it was a weird glitch that would be fixed.  But 
>> now I am seeing slowdowns with IntModN.jl too (factor more like 4x as slow).
>>
>> You can see this at https://travis-ci.org/andrewcooke/IntModN.jl 
>> (compare the timing results in the two jobs) and at 
>> https://travis-ci.org/andrewcooke/CRC.jl/builds/66140801 (i have been 
>> cancelling jobs there, so the examples aren't as complete).
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>

Reply via email to