It might be a good idea for HDF.jl to load and provide JLD.jl for a short
deprecation period.

On Friday, July 17, 2015, Matt Bauman <[email protected]> wrote:

> How should packages that depend upon JLD update their REQUIRE files?
> Should they just tag a new version that requires JLD instead (or in
> addition to, if they also use HDF5's capabilities)?
>
> On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 10:14:27 AM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> If you use HDF5/JLD, the next time you update packages you probably want
>> to
>> say Pkg.add("JLD"). JLD has been split off from HDF5 into a separate
>> package,
>> so when HDF5 updates you will lose JLD functionality unless you add the
>> new
>> package.
>>
>> Going forward, you only need to say "using JLD" rather than "using HDF5,
>> JLD."
>> That said, there's no harm in the latter, and you'll need it anyway if
>> you're
>> in the habit of using HDF5 functionality like creating groups, etc.
>>
>> Best,
>> --Tim
>>
>>

Reply via email to