Please ignore the "anonymous function" part above. I'm creating a function in my macro inside a let block so that it doesn't pollute the surrounding scope. Later on, when the same macro is used on a different expression, I wont be able to access this same function to extend it inside another let block. I was looking for a way to do this.
On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 1:12:36 AM UTC+5:30, Vinuth Madinur wrote: > > It's a little complicated scenario to explain. It's like this: > > I have a macro that replaces an expression with a function whose name > isn't fixed / known / is anonymous / created inside a closured scope. Later > on I want the ability to add methods to this. > > > > On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 12:57:01 AM UTC+5:30, Tom Breloff wrote: >> >> Can you tell us more about your end-goal? I have a feeling that you're >> not thinking about this in a Julian way, but I'm not entirely sure what you >> want to be able to do. >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Vinuth Madinur <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a way to add a method to a generic function during runtime? Or >>> to merge two generic functions? For example: >>> >>> >>> function abc end >>> function xyz end >>> >>> function add_method(method, func) >>> #Add method to func >>> end >>> >>> add_method(xyz) do x::Int >>> x*2 >>> end >>> >>> or >>> >>> add_method(x -> x * 4, abc) >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vinuth. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
