thank you, again
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 3:59:01 PM UTC-4, Jameson wrote: > > Module import/using paths are always absolute (from Main), unless prefixed > by one (or more) dots. So for this example, try: > using .SubModule > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM Jeffrey Sarnoff <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> src/SubModule.jl defines the SubModule >> removing "using SubModule" and accessing subThing with SubModule.subThing >> does work (and I had not tried that) >> so that helps -- thank you >> >> On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 10:00:29 AM UTC-4, Tero Frondelius wrote: >>> >>> Maybe it's otherwise ok, just remove "using SubModule". I assume that >>> your "src/file2.jl" defines the SubModule and when you include it you don't >>> have to write using SubModule at all. Or I just misunderstood your >>> question. >>> >>> On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 4:45:29 PM UTC+3, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: >>>> >>>> above should read >>>> >>>> Package.jl >>>> module Package >>>> include("src/file1.jl") >>>> include( "src/submodule.jl") >>>> using SubModule >>>> include( "src/file2.jl" ) # needs subThing >>>> end >>>> >>>> On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 9:41:47 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have a package layed out something like this: >>>>> >>>>> Package >>>>> Package.jl >>>>> src >>>>> file1.jl >>>>> submodule.jl >>>>> module SubModule >>>>> export subThing >>>>> end >>>>> file2.jl >>>>> ...use subThing... >>>>> >>>>> Package.jl >>>>> include("src/file1.jl") >>>>> include( "src/submodule.jl") >>>>> using SubModule >>>>> include( "src/file2.jl" ) >>>>> >>>>> which causes (v0.4) ERROR: LoadError: ArgumentError: Sub not found in >>>>> path >>>>> and so does >>>>> ... import SubModule: subThing >>>>> >>>>> Is there a way to do this without making SubModule a separate package? >>>>> >>>>
