On Sunday, August 09, 2015 06:45:07 PM Sebastian Good wrote: > I found myself trying to reinterpret a subarray today, and it didn't work. > There are obviously plenty of cases where this makes no sense, but it would > be convenient where it did. Is this on someone's roadmap?
Not mine :-). If you're interested in implementing this, check out the `iscontiguous` function in subarray.jl---that should basically handle the checking to see if this makes sense. Best, --Tim
