Excellent, thanks. I searched through issues but didn't hit that one.
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 10:39:27 PM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Not yet. Maybe for 0.5? > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/1974 > > > On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 7:35:20 PM UTC-7, Dominique Orban wrote: >> >> I'm wondering if implementing getfield() / setfield!() for a composite >> type could be a good design for getters and setters. Say I have a type >> >> type Thing >> a :: Int >> b :: int >> end >> >> where I'm requiring the `a` field to be even. It'd be great to be able to >> type >> >> thing = Thing() >> thing.a = 3 >> >> and receive an error. >> >> In 0.3.10 and 0.4, I can't implement setfield!(): >> ERROR: cannot define function setfield!; it already has a value. >> >> Is there a way to do this? >> >
