Here, my point is the word "Abstract"
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 3:42:16 PM UTC+2, Kristoffer Carlsson wrote:
>
> They are the same. The vector is just a type alias for the array of size
> 1. Personally I like vector because to me it is clearer to read.
>
> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 12:09:23 PM UTC+2, Sisyphuss wrote:
>>
>> Is `function sum{T<:FloatingPoint}(x::AbstractArray{T,1}) ` or
>> `function sum{T<:FloatingPoint}(x::AbstractVector{T}) ` better?
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:29:15 AM UTC+2, René Donner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think this does what you want:
>>>
>>> function sum{T<:FloatingPoint}(x::Array{T,1})
>>> println("hi")
>>> end
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rene
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:22 schrieb Uwe Fechner <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> > Ok, the following definition works on Julia 0.4, but not with 0.3:
>>> >
>>> > FloatArray = Union{Array{Float32, 1}, Array{Float64, 1}}
>>> >
>>> > function sum(x::FloatArray).
>>> >
>>> > Any idea?
>>> >
>>> > Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015 11:07:16 UTC+2 schrieb Uwe Fechner:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > I want to write a function, that can operate on any one dimensional
>>> array of floating point numbers.
>>> >
>>> > The following works, but only for Float64:
>>> >
>>> > function sum(x::Array{Float64,1})
>>> >
>>> > The following does not work:
>>> >
>>> > function sum(x::Array{AbstractFloat,1})
>>> >
>>> > Any idea?
>>> >
>>> > Uwe
>>>
>>>
