It works
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:44:51 PM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > I can do that. If it goes south, I note the issue. You showed me how to > use it the first time, Thanks TIm. > > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 4:20:22 PM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote: >> >> They were split, but google hasn't quite caught up to it. And all the old >> issues are of course still there in the original HDF5 repository. >> >> I don't remember the status of this at all. I hate to say it, but why >> don't >> you just try it out and see if it works? If not, please file an issue--- >> shouldn't be hard to fix. >> >> --Tim >> >> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37:32 PM Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: >> > I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state >> of >> > JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have >> > misread the year) >> > He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, >> which >> > were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something >> about >> > it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing >> that, >> > I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now >> looking >> > for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, >> > --- or am I ready for some coffee? >> > >> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski >> wrote: >> > > JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out >> of >> > > the box? >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC <[email protected] >> > > >> > > <javascript:>> wrote: >> > >> Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? >> > >> >> > >> https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl >> > >> >> > >> El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey >> Sarnoff >> > >> >> > >> escribió: >> > >>> Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x >> .. +x? >> >>
