>
> Maybe it would be best if this was
> tried out with a large Julia project to see the ins and outs?
> Volunteers?


I imagine that the only way that a tentative switch to a "JuliaUsers" repo 
on Github would gain any significant traction is if the repo was under the 
JuliaLang org.

On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 5:15:12 AM UTC-4, Mauro wrote:
>
> >> Do any of these other suggestions have a mailing list interface? 
> > 
> > GitHub's issue tracking interface does. 
>
> In my email client the threading doesn't seem to work well with github 
> issue-emails, so I end up using the web interface most of the time. 
> Otherwise it might work well.  I had a quick look around on the 
> internet, not many projects seem to use issues as mailing list.  I only 
> found these: 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-houdini/2015Sep/0004.html 
> https://github.com/hapijs/discuss/issues 
>
> @-notifications could be quite nice.  Maybe it would be best if this was 
> tried out with a large Julia project to see the ins and outs? 
> Volunteers? 
>
> > On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 3:59:51 PM UTC-4, Robert DJ wrote: 
> >> 
> >> I'm not a fan of Google, so I think it would great to find another 
> forum. 
> >> Besides, I fully agree with the technical issues mentioned. 
> >> 
> >> Regarding the need for user accounts on e.g. GitHub, I don't see how 
> that 
> >> is different from requiring a Google account for participating here... 
> >> 
> >> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 5:33:33 PM UTC+2, Jarrett Revels 
> wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> I often find myself wishing that this forum was just a GitHub repo, 
> with 
> >>> posts as issues. It would be great for supporting @-style mentions, 
> >>> markdown, issue-linking, etc. The main downside would be forcing 
> everybody 
> >>> to have GitHub account (not bad IMO, but I can see others having an 
> issue 
> >>> for it). 
> >>> 
> >>> It would probably be a bad idea to upheave the forums, anyway, 
> especially 
> >>> at such a critical moment in Julia's development (v0.4 getting 
> released 
> >>> soon). I doubt this is going to happen. 
> >>> 
> >>> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:34:58 AM UTC-4, Nils Gudat wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Was just thinking about this as first I had to try opening a thread 
> here 
> >>>> a couple of times before any posts were actually displayed, and then 
> read 
> >>>> through this 
> >>>> <
> http://discuss.junolab.org/t/how-to-let-julia-be-the-boss-of-juno-windows-windows-issue/320>
>  
>
> >>>> thread on Mike's Juno Discuss forum, where a user had a question 
> which was 
> >>>> almost answered by the nice auto-suggestion feature that pops up when 
> you 
> >>>> ask a question. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> I feel that Google Groups has mostly downsides - the system is slow, 
> >>>> with posts frequently not loading, double posts because of this, no 
> proper 
> >>>> code formatting or Markdown support etc. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Is there a chance this could be moved to something like Discuss or is 
> >>>> there too much inertia in having an "established" forum on Google 
> Groups? 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
>
>

Reply via email to