Yes, but it requires confirmation that Clang.jl effectively does that and I don't have a Clang.jl at hand now (it might have been me, though the Git history that I have does not show it)
sexta-feira, 11 de Setembro de 2015 às 22:01:05 UTC+1, Scott Jones escreveu: > > That should be reported as a bug in Clang.jl. > size_t should is unsigned 32 or 64-bit (on today's platforms), and Cint is > signed 32-bit, not at all the same! > > On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 11:22:13 PM UTC-4, J Luis wrote: >> >> Ok, couldn't resist to one more attempt and I may have found the issue. >> If you look at the n_alloc member in here >> >> https://github.com/joa-quim/GMT.jl/blob/master/src/libgmt_h.jl#L1445 >> >> and here >> >> >> http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu/projects/gmt/repository/entry/branches/5.2.0/src/gmt_resources.h#L543 >> >> you'll notice that it is size_t in C an Cint in Julia (converted with >> Clang). If I change the Julia type to Csize_t than the offsets are the same. >> >> Now I'm really going to sleep. >> >> sexta-feira, 11 de Setembro de 2015 às 04:07:53 UTC+1, J Luis escreveu: >>> >>> No, that's not the case. Pure C built with VS2013 >>> >>> Ok, tomorrow I'll try to post links to code showing this case. >>> >>> sexta-feira, 11 de Setembro de 2015 às 04:03:48 UTC+1, Jameson escreveu: >>>> >>>> generally no, unless you are using C++11 features or ms-bitfields >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:01 PM J Luis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks, it's very late here and posting the case will take time. But >>>>> one thing before I go. >>>>> The fact that I'm using a Julia compiled with mingw64 and accessing a >>>>> dll built with VS could explain this, no? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> sexta-feira, 11 de Setembro de 2015 às 03:47:12 UTC+1, Jameson >>>>> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes (unless C doesn't have an equivalent representation), can you >>>>>> post the case? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:43 PM J Luis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When we have a immutable that mimics a C struct, are the results of >>>>>>> fieldoffsets() from the Julia side and offsetoff() at the C side >>>>>>> supposed >>>>>>> to give the same result? >>>>>>> (Well, I already found one case were they don't) >>>>>>> >>>>>>
