On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Jon Norberg <[email protected]> wrote: > quick question: How do I define a type most effective so that I can give it > both single values, vectors and Arrays as variables? > > I now have: > > type x > value::Array{Float64} > end > > I can do x(rand(3)) as well as x(rand(3,3)) but not x(0.1)
Depends on what you need. If you don't need the field to be a leaftype (as in your code above), Union should work fine. > > the answer is probably in the forums but I couldn't construct a good search > to find it :-/ > > Thanks
