>
>  But still, i'd prefer error messages that have more content...

Yes, there are a number of open issues already about errors, warnings, and
backtraces. The situation should improve when we bump to a newer LLVM
version.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Andreas Lobinger <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 2:52:43 PM UTC+2, Yichao Yu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Andreas Lobinger <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello colleagues,
>> >
>> > the warning is quite nice, but a location would be nicer. How can i
>> track
>> > down, which line triggered the warning?
>>
>> What I did was just `grep -R`
>>
>
> I did similar (find all in editor for the full package dir). But still,
> i'd prefer error messages that have more content...
>

Reply via email to