in short: you can't. alternatives include using a Tuple or using a Dict
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM Damien <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing code in which I generate a composite type and various methods > based on the fields of another type. > > I can do this at the expressions level with macros, but can I also > generate the new type definition in a plain function using introspection? > > Best >
