I've encountered a similar problem, but do not have a solution to report. 

 I'm not sure why require was depreciated. It worked quite well. 

On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 10:35:20 AM UTC-4, Christopher Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi all-
>
> I am trying to load a file of functions on a cluster of computers. In the 
> past, I used require() (now depreciated) and the sendto() function 
> described here  
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27677399/julia-how-to-copy-data-to-another-processor-in-julia>to
>  
> make a data variable available on all workers. ( Note that I cannot simply 
> load the data upon initializing the program because the data will change 
> outside of the module, eventually receiving a stream of data from another 
> program. So speed and flexibility is imperative).  As recommended here 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/$20require/julia-users/6zBKw4nd20I/5JLt7Ded0zkJ>,
>  
> I defined a module containing the functions and used "using MyModule" to 
> send it to the available workers. It seems that the major limitation of 
> this approach is that data is not available to the functions within the 
> module when using sendto(). I suspect this is because modules are 
> encapsulated from other variables and functions. Bearing that in mind:
>
>
> 1. Is there a way around this problem using the module method? 
>
> 2. Alternatively, is there a way I can make the functions and packages 
> available to the workers without using modules? Perhaps something akin to 
> the old require method? 
>
> 3. Or is there a way to send the data via map() along with my function and 
> distributed array? Essentially, my code loads stored inputs for numerous 
> kernel density functions and converts them to a distributed array of 
> arrays. For example:
>
> map(EvalKDFs,MyDistArray)
>
> Each time the above function is called, "MyData" needs to be available to 
> the function EvalKDFs. However, map(EvalKDFs,MyDistArray,MyData) does not 
> work because there is one array of data and many arrays within MyDistArray.
>
> I might be able to post a stripped down version of my code if my 
> description does not suffice. 
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. 
>
>

Reply via email to