Is it common to doc arbitrary numbers?
I can’t see much use for documenting things like that either. We could either throw an error in @doc if you try to document a number or change the parser to ignore cases such as that. I’d suspect it would be simpler to fix up @doc rather than the parser. — Mike On Saturday, 10 October 2015 18:18:06 UTC+2, Isaiah wrote: > > I agree with MDC Francis that this is kind of odd. Is it common to doc > arbitrary numbers? Supporting this isnt necessary to doc MathConsts... > > (it also didn't seem to work properly for ints or floats when I tried -- > the doc was added to meta, but help didn't seem to find it). > On Oct 10, 2015 11:50 AM, "Michael Hatherly" <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> If you want to disable the automatic @doc then you can append a ; to the >> string or nest the expressions in a begin ... end block: >> >> "hello"; >> 3.142 >> >> begin >> "hello" >> 3.142 >> end >> >> — Mike >> >> >> >> On Friday, 9 October 2015 22:02:37 UTC+2, Michael Francis wrote: >>> >>> Julia 0.4 rc4 >>> >>> I get the following unexpected (to me) behavior - >>> >>> julia> parse( "\"hello\"\n3.142" ) >>> :(@doc "hello" 3.142) >>> >>> is this intentional ? >>> >>>
