Let's consider 2 types with inner constructors:
type Foo
x::Array{Int,1}
Foo() = Foo(zeros(Int, 10))
end
type Bar{T}
x::Array{T,1}
Bar() = Bar(zeros(T, 10))
end
The only difference between them is that `Bar` has type parameter while
`Foo` doesn't. I'd expect their inner constructors behave the same way, but
`Bar` turns to ignore inner constructor definition:
julia> methods(Foo)
3-element Array{Any,1}:
call(::Type{Foo}) at /home/<username>/work/playground/contructors.jl:5
call{T}(::Type{T}, arg) at essentials.jl:56
call{T}(::Type{T}, args...) at essentials.jl:57
julia> methods(Bar)
2-element Array{Any,1}:
call{T}(::Type{T}, arg) at essentials.jl:56
call{T}(::Type{T}, args...) at essentials.jl:57
Is it a bug or a feature and how to make `Bar` recognize inner constructor
(outer constructor is not an option here since it uses type parameter `T`
in constructor body, but not in its constructor)?
