I am using Julia 0.4 for this purpose, if that's what is meant by "0.4 
only". 

On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 9:53:09 AM UTC+5:30, Jacob Quinn wrote:
>
> Oh yes, I forgot to mention that the CSV/DataStreams code is 0.4 only. 
> Definitely interested to hear about any results/experiences though.
>
> -Jacob
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Yichao Yu <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Grey Marsh <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>> > @Jacob, I tried your approach. Somehow it got stuck in the "@time ds =
>> > DataStreams.DataTable(f)" line. After 15 minutes running, julia is using
>> > ~500mb and 1 cpu core with no sign of end. The memory use has been 
>> almost
>> > same for the whole duration of 15 minutes. I'm letting it run, hoping 
>> that
>> > it finishes after some time.
>> >
>> > From your run, I can see it needs 12gb memory which is higher than my
>> > machine memory of 8gb. could it be the problem?
>>
>> 12GB is the total number of memory ever allocated during the timing. A
>> lot of them might be intermediate results that are freed by the GC.
>> Also, from the output of @time, it looks like 0.4.
>>
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 2:28:09 AM UTC+5:30, Jacob Quinn 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm hesitant to suggest, but if you're in a bind, I have an 
>> experimental
>> >> package for fast CSV reading. The API has stabilized somewhat over the 
>> last
>> >> week and I'm planning a more broad release soon, but I'd still 
>> consider it
>> >> alpha mode. That said, if anyone's willing to give it a drive, you 
>> just need
>> >> to
>> >>
>> >> Pkg.add("Libz")
>> >> Pkg.add("NullableArrays")
>> >> Pkg.clone("https://github.com/quinnj/DataStreams.jl";)
>> >> Pkg.clone("https://github.com/quinnj/CSV.jl";)
>> >>
>> >> With the original file referenced here I get:
>> >>
>> >> julia> reload("CSV")
>> >>
>> >> julia> f = 
>> CSV.Source("/Users/jacobquinn/Downloads/train.csv";null="NA")
>> >> CSV.Source: "/Users/jacobquinn/Downloads/train.csv"
>> >> delim: ','
>> >> quotechar: '"'
>> >> escapechar: '\\'
>> >> null: "NA"
>> >> schema:
>> >> 
>> DataStreams.Schema(UTF8String["ID","VAR_0001","VAR_0002","VAR_0003","VAR_0004","VAR_0005","VAR_0006","VAR_0007","VAR_0008","VAR_0009"
>> >> …
>> >> 
>> "VAR_1926","VAR_1927","VAR_1928","VAR_1929","VAR_1930","VAR_1931","VAR_1932","VAR_1933","VAR_1934","target"],[Int64,DataStreams.PointerString,Int64,Int64,Int64,DataStreams.PointerString,Int64,Int64,DataStreams.PointerString,DataStreams.PointerString
>> >> …
>> >> 
>> Int64,Int64,Int64,Int64,Int64,Int64,Int64,Int64,DataStreams.PointerString,Int64],145231,1934)
>> >> dateformat: Base.Dates.DateFormat(Base.Dates.Slot[],"","english")
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> julia> @time ds = DataStreams.DataTable(f)
>> >>  43.513800 seconds (694.00 M allocations: 12.775 GB, 2.55% gc time)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You can convert the result to a DataFrame with:
>> >>
>> >> function DataFrames.DataFrame(dt::DataStreams.DataTable)
>> >>     cols = dt.schema.cols
>> >>     data = Array(Any,cols)
>> >>     types = DataStreams.types(dt)
>> >>     for i = 1:cols
>> >>         data[i] = DataStreams.column(dt,i,types[i])
>> >>     end
>> >>     return DataFrame(data,Symbol[symbol(x) for x in dt.schema.header])
>> >> end
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Jacob
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:40 PM, feza <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Finally was able to load it, but the process   consumes a ton of 
>> memory.
>> >>> julia> @time train = readtable("./test.csv");
>> >>> 124.575362 seconds (376.11 M allocations: 13.438 GB, 10.77% gc time)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 4:34:05 PM UTC-4, feza wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Same here on a 12gb ram machine
>> >>>>
>> >>>>                _
>> >>>>    _       _ _(_)_     |  A fresh approach to technical computing
>> >>>>   (_)     | (_) (_)    |  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org
>> >>>>    _ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "?help" for help.
>> >>>>   | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
>> >>>>   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.5.0-dev+429 (2015-09-29 09:47 
>> UTC)
>> >>>>  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit f71e449 (14 days old master)
>> >>>> |__/                   |  x86_64-w64-mingw32
>> >>>>
>> >>>> julia> using DataFrames
>> >>>>
>> >>>> julia> train = readtable("./test.csv");
>> >>>> ERROR: OutOfMemoryError()
>> >>>>  in resize! at array.jl:452
>> >>>>  in readnrows! at
>> >>>> C:\Users\Mustafa\.julia\v0.5\DataFrames\src\dataframe\io.jl:164
>> >>>>  in readtable! at
>> >>>> C:\Users\Mustafa\.julia\v0.5\DataFrames\src\dataframe\io.jl:767
>> >>>>  in readtable at
>> >>>> C:\Users\Mustafa\.julia\v0.5\DataFrames\src\dataframe\io.jl:847
>> >>>>  in readtable at
>> >>>> C:\Users\Mustafa\.julia\v0.5\DataFrames\src\dataframe\io.jl:893
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 3:47:58 PM UTC-4, Yichao Yu wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Oct 13, 2015 2:47 PM, "Grey Marsh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Which julia version are you using. There's sime gc tweak on 0.4 for
>> >>>>> that.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > I was trying to load the training dataset from springleaf 
>> marketing
>> >>>>> > response on Kaggle. The csv is 921 mb, has 145321 row and 1934 
>> columns. My
>> >>>>> > machine has 8 gb ram and julia ate 5.8gb+ memory after that I 
>> stopped julia
>> >>>>> > as there was barely any memory left for OS to function properly. 
>> It took
>> >>>>> > about 5-6 minutes later for the incomplete operation. I've 
>> windows 8  64bit.
>> >>>>> > Used the following code to read the csv to Julia:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > using DataFrames
>> >>>>> > train = readtable("C:\\train.csv")
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Next I tried to to load the same file in python:
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > import pandas as pd
>> >>>>> > train = pd.read_csv("C:\\train.csv")
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > This took ~2.4gb memory, about a minute time
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Checking the same in R again:
>> >>>>> > df = read.csv('E:/Libraries/train.csv', as.is = T)
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > This took 2-3 minutes and consumes 3.5gb mem on the same machine.
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> > Why such discrepancy and why Julia even fails to load the csv 
>> before
>> >>>>> > running out of memory? If there is any better way to get the file 
>> loaded in
>> >>>>> > Julia?
>> >>>>> >
>> >>>>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to