I found that I can get double dollar signs with a minor change: $$~ latex code here ~$$
A bit hacky, but \[ and \] don't work as expected, $$\n doesn't work, I can search and replace easily, and can't bring my self to have any text after my opening $$. Consistency with Pandoc would be a good thing. I'm not so crazy about `` as it takes some work to distinguish from ```, though I'm sure I could get used to it. On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 10:53:38 AM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Scholarly Markdown uses double backticks for inline math: > > http://scholarlymarkdown.com/Scholarly-Markdown-Guide.html#math > > Has two nice properties: > > 1. doesn't conflict with our string interpolation syntax; > 2. gracefully degrades to code markup in other Markdowns (e.g. GitHub) > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Steven G. Johnson <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I wish it would use the same equation syntax as pandoc and Jupyter. You >> need a darn good reason to be different from the dominant implementation of >> equations in Markdown. >> >> (And "$$ is deprecated in LaTeX is not a good enough reason. Markdown >> isn't LaTeX.) > > >
