That has promise, Kristoffer. I did port something of that nature, expecting it to work well -- but there was some numerical mush in more than a couple of trailing bits in some cases. Using more terms did not help. Thinking about it just now, it might be more robustly stable if I expand in one direction only upfrom or downfrom some pretabulated points.
On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 2:47:57 AM UTC-4, Kristoffer Carlsson wrote: > > Use a truncated Taylor series around the point maybe?
