On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 4:56:12 PM UTC+1, Glen O wrote: > > Incidentally, it would be nice if ∈ could be used as another option - it's > just another way of saying "in", but it would look nicer in certain > mathematical contexts, and it's not like the symbol would be used in > another way in that position. >
I very much like the idea of using for ∈ 1:n. In fact, as ∈ is a direct synonym for the function in, would it not make sense to let it be a synonym also in this context? Would it be problematic in some way? What is the difference in the meanings of in that prevents this from already being the case?
