On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 7:56:54 AM UTC+1, Gabor wrote: > > Confusion? > Considering the investment into learning all the new and powerful Julia > language constructs, > I don't see why exactly this elegant duality would be a problem for anyone. >
I don't think = and in represent an elegant duality. They seem a very odd couple to me (even though I have been using = in Matlab for 15 years.) On the other hand, = and ∈ do seem to offer an elegant duality, since they are already synonyms in other contexts. The concept of 'in' also seems more logical than '=', which is an assignment operator. One advantage of = over 'in' is that it sticks out more visually. That is solved by ∈, though.
