On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:14:16 AM UTC, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > where I copy/paste into julia to use her parsing algs >
[I'm not sure this is against the community standards (as has been discussed).. To me this seems innocent enough, but I've been training to say "[..] Julia and its [whatever]"..] On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 9:07:28 AM UTC-5, David P. Sanders wrote: >> >> >> >> El lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2015, 7:58:17 (UTC-6), Stefan Karpinski >> escribió: >>> >>> I think we should probably make it possible to access the full string >>> of a numeric literal in a macro but that is a substantial change to the >>> parser. >>> >> >> That would be great. >> > Yes, I would like e.g. numeric literals say 0.5 and 0.50 that get you the *same* and precise floating point number to be accessible as a string. Then for decimal floating point where 0.50 is not the same value, it seems like we could have a macro to change binary float literals to decimal, and also get 0.1 exact.. > >> Off-topic: Jeffrey, will your Float128 library be correctly-rounded? >> > -- Palli.
