Hi Bart, I'm not an expert, but this sounds cool and from your description, I wonder if a better name would be Boost.jl or something?
Best regards, Eric On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 4:51:34 PM UTC+8, Bart Janssens wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > Yes, that's exactly right. I'd just like to add that the specific use case > that I have in mind are C++ projects that already invested in a Python > interface using Boost.Python. The aim is to make it easy to add a Julia > interface with little effort. > This is not intended to compete with Cxx.jl, depending on the exact nature > of the C++ project authors may prefer doing the wrapping work in C++ (with > CppWrapper.jl) or in Julia (with Cxx.jl). > > Cheers, > > Bart >
