Ok in that case, I'll look into building it into Plots as an "inline backend"... meaning the JSON conversion and html wrapping can just happen directly instead of calling out to an existing package. Honestly, that might turn out to be easier anyways.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Randy Zwitch <[email protected]> wrote: > Uh, I take that back. The latest update to the Plotly package references > 0.2.1 and is mostly API calls. I don't time for a whole re-write. > > https://github.com/plotly/Plotly.jl > > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 2:00:02 PM UTC-5, Randy Zwitch wrote: >> >> Plot.ly already has a Julia package, so it seems like just a matter of >> not calling the API and instead doing the JS calls. I think the bigger >> question is whether the company has a plan to update their package yet. I'd >> (probably) be interested in fixing the package, assuming it didn't take >> hours and hours of work to switch it over to the JavaScript library. >> >> On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 1:41:01 PM UTC-5, Tom Breloff wrote: >>> >>> This is great! For those involved with Plotly.jl, Vega.jl, Bokeh.jl, or >>> anything else with similar technology, are there any major hurdles in >>> accessing this from Julia? >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Hans-Peter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> See announcement: https://plot.ly/javascript/open-source-announcement/. >>>> >>>> I only used PyPlot so far but this sounds interesting. Offline 'plotly >>>> plotting' without api key should be possible now. >>>> >>> >>>
