On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 8:47:50 PM UTC, bernhard wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity: why is this release 54mb (up from 40mb for 0.4). I am 
> referring to the file size of the Win 64bit binaries here.
>

Another curiosity..:

The number of MB sound about right, and when I checked about the same as 
the Linux version ("Generic Linux binaries"). I tried installing the 
Windows version and it takes almost half a gig..

On Linux you have dependencies, but do they make up for the difference (my 
0.4.1 from a repository is only 101 MB installed)? My guess, that seems 
wrong, is that if you do not use pure Julia code, and include C (or Fortran 
source code) then you use the C compiler you can count on to be installed 
on Linux. Am I wrong, since there is does not seem to be a dependency for a 
full compiler (or is there not one as there should always be a compiler, 
and dependencies are skipped?). What I only found:

libgcc1 132 kB
libgfortran3 1234 kB

Does the Windows build of Julia download more after/while running the 
self-extracting executable? Such as a C compiler..?


> Am Montag, 9. November 2015 20:37:48 UTC+1 schrieb Tony Kelman:
>>
>> Hello all! The latest bugfix releases of both 0.4.x and 0.3.x Julia lines 
>> have been released. Binaries are available from the usual place 
>> <http://julialang.org/downloads/> (see Old releases 
>> <http://julialang.org/downloads/oldreleases.html> for 0.3.12), and as is 
>> typical with such things, please report all issues to either the issue 
>> tracker <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues>, or email the 
>> julia-users list. (If you respond to this message on julia-users, please do 
>> not cc julia-news which is intended to be low-volume.)
>>
>> These are bugfix releases. 0.3.12 is likely to be the last release in the 
>> 0.3.x line unless any critical bugs or regressions are identified. To see 
>> the list of bugs fixed since 0.3.11, see this commit log 
>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.3.11...v0.3.12>. Bugfix 
>> backports to the 0.4.x line will be continuing with a target of one point 
>> release per month. See this commit log 
>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.4.0...v0.4.1> for the 
>> list of bugs fixed between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1. If you are a package author and 
>> want to rely on functionality that did not work in 0.4.0 but does work in 
>> 0.4.1 in your package, please be sure to change the minimum julia version 
>> in your REQUIRE file to 0.4.1 accordingly. If you're not sure about this, 
>> you can test your package specifically against 0.4.0 on Travis and/or 
>> locally.
>>
>> These are recommended upgrades for anyone using previous releases, and 
>> should act as drop-in replacements for their respective minor-version 
>> predecessors. If 0.3.12 introduces any regressions relative to any previous 
>> 0.3.x release, or if 0.4.1 introduces any regressions relative to 0.4.0, 
>> please let us know.
>>
>> -Tony
>>
>>

Reply via email to