Le dimanche 29 novembre 2015 à 08:28 -0800, Cedric St-Jean a écrit : > What I would try: > > 1. ProfileView to pinpoint the bottleneck further > 2. FastAnonymous to fix the lambda > 3. http://julia-demo.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/performance-tip > s.html In particular, you may check `code_typed`. I don't have > experience with `split` and `eachline`. It's possible that they are > not type stable (the compiler can't predict their output's type). I > would try `for w::ASCIIString in ...` > 4. Dict{ASCIIString, Int}() > 5. Your loop will hash each string twice. I don't know how to fix > that, anyone? You can use the unexported Base.ht_keyindex() function like this: https://github.com/nalimilan/FreqTables.jl/blob/7884c000e6797d7ec621e07 b8da58e7939e39867/src/freqtable.jl#L36
But this is at your own risk, as it may change without warning in a future Julia release. We really need a public API for it. Regards > > Good luck, > > Cédric > > On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 8:08:49 PM UTC-5, Lampkld wrote: > > Maybe it's the lambda? These are slow in julia right now.
