Hi Olli, I'm considering an approach like this for wrapping C++ class member functions in my CppWrapper package. I just wonder, is this kind of object.member_function(arguments) syntax acceptable for Julia, or is member_function(object, other_arguments) preferred? The former will be more natural for people used to the C++ interface, while the latter conforms better to Julia's way of working I think.
Cheers, Bart On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 6:19:29 PM UTC+1, Olli Väinölä wrote: > julia> class_1.set_a(10) > 10 > > julia> class_1.get_a() > 10 > > not sure if someone has already invented this but in PyPlot I guess same > has been archived with a Dict. Still, all fun and games. > >
