I did not see that. I was browsing through coverage and saw that many parts were left. Nevertheless I will work on some other parts.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> wrote: > These functions are quite extensively tested here: > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/c072d1ce73345e153e4fddf656cda544013b1219/test/numbers.jl#L1171-L1610 > > If you find some aspect of their behavior which is not well tested, by all > means add more tests. > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Pranit Bauva <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Thanks! I am writing testing code for base/int.jl so had some doubts. >> >> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Note that this is in the documentation for these functions: >> > >> > help?> % >> > search: % .% >> > >> > rem(x, y) >> > %(x, y) >> > >> > Remainder from Euclidean division, returning a value of the same sign >> > as >> > x, and >> > smaller in magnitude than y. This value is always exact. >> > >> > x == div(x,y)*y + rem(x,y) >> > >> > help?> mod >> > search: mod modf mod1 module mod2pi Module module_name module_parent >> > chmod >> > invmod >> > >> > mod(x, y) >> > >> > Modulus after flooring division, returning in the range [0,y), if y is >> > positive, >> > or (y,0] if y is negative. >> > >> > x == fld(x,y)*y + mod(x,y) >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Stefan Karpinski >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> The % operator is shorthand rem, which computes the remainder; the sign >> >> of >> >> the result matches the first argument. The mod function also exists, >> >> which >> >> computes the modulus, the result of which matches its second argument. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Pranit Bauva <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hey everyone! >> >>> >> >>> Julia's way of handling negative values in % seem to be different. >> >>> julia> 7 % -3 >> >>> 1 >> >>> >> >>> julia> -7 % 3 >> >>> -1 >> >>> >> >>> julia> -7 % -3 >> >>> -1 >> >>> >> >>> julia> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Is this a bug or a feature? >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Pranit Bauva >> >> >> >> >> > > >
