Mike, Cool! Glad it worked :) (Phew!)
Tony, Yeah, this is just javascript in the browser. No node.js. Thanks :) On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 10:34:38 PM UTC+8, Tony Kelman wrote: > > This is explicitly designed for interoperating with javascript in the > browser, not local js execution engines like node.js, right? Given how > widely used node is, it might not be unambiguous to claim JSCall.jl for a > browser specific interoperability package. > > Still, cool stuff. >
