I'd prefer @inline @generated because @generated @inline seems to say "generate this function inline" (not "inline the function generated")
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 2:50:55 PM UTC-5, Matt Bauman wrote: > > Yeah, I was thinking about that as I responded. An easier intermediate > solution (which could be implemented purely in the Julia macro) would be to > support `@inline quote … end`. Either way, the semantics are a little > strange — you're not inlining the quote block, nor are you inlining the > function generator itself. > > On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 2:39:23 PM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> This seems like a viable feature request if you want to open an issue – >> i.e. @inline @generated or @generated @inline should arrange that the >> resulting function body be annotated appropriately. >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Matt Bauman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You need to manually attach the inline annotation within the function >>> body that gets generated. See, e.g., >>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/275c7e8929dd391960ba88e741c6f537ccca6cc9/base/multidimensional.jl#L233-L236 >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 2:27:14 PM UTC-5, Erik Schnetter wrote: >>>> >>>> I have a generated function that generates a very small function >>>> (essentially a vector load instruction). Unfortunately, this function >>>> is not inlined, and I thus want to mark the generated function as >>>> @inline. How do I do so? >>>> >>>> Writing either "@inline @generated" or "@generated @inline" both fail. >>>> >>>> -erik >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> >>>> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ >>>> >>> >>
