but then again the benchmarks are flawed because other implementations are 
also timing the interpreters startup time.

El martes, 26 de enero de 2016, 22:07:54 (UTC-6), George escribió:
>
> I was surprised to se the results on the following benchmarks:
> https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
>
> Some benchmarks of different languages 
> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#brainfuck>Brainfuck
>
> Brainfuck <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/tree/master/brainfuck>
> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#benchb>bench.b
> LanguageTime,sMemory, Mb
> Nim Clang 3.21 0.7
> Felix 4.07 1.3
> Nim Gcc 4.52 0.6
> Java 4.94 147.6
> C++ 5.08 1.1
> Rust 5.46 4.9
> Scala 5.90 116.3
> D 6.57 1.0
> D Ldc 6.61 0.9
> Crystal 6.97 1.3
> Go 7.29 1.3
> Javascript Node 8.74 15.0
> D Gdc 8.87 1.0
> Julia 9.25 59.0
> Javascript V8 9.41 8.1
> Go Gcc 13.60 10.0
> Python Pypy 13.94 55.4
> Javascript Jx 17.14 11.0
> C# Mono 18.08 15.4
> OOC 48.86 1.3
> Ruby JRuby 87.05 124.1
> Ruby Topaz 112.91 36.0
> Ruby JRuby9K 160.15 297.2
> Ruby 226.86 8.0
> Tcl 262.20 2.7
> Python 452.44 4.9
> Ruby Rbx 472.08 45.0
> Python3 480.78 5.5 <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks#mandelb>mandel.b
>
> Mandel in Brainfuck 
> <https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/blob/master/brainfuck/mandel.b>
> LanguageTime,sMemory, Mb
> Nim Clang 28.96 1.0
> Felix 40.06 3.7
> D Ldc 43.30 0.9
> D 45.29 1.2
> Rust 46.34 4.9
> Crystal 48.62 1.3
> Nim Gcc 50.45 0.9
> Go 52.56 7.6
> Java 55.14 69.9
> Cpp 56.63 1.1
> Scala 64.37 126.4
> D Gdc 70.12 1.5
> Go Gcc 85.67 10.7
> Javascript Node 92.65 15.8
> Julia 94.33 56.9
> ...

Reply via email to