How about an unofficial way? If you are to do it, how would you do it?

Thanks

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This application is a little more plausible since it's an optimization and
> you can tolerate false negatives (functions that are actually the same but
> appear different). There's no official way to do this but maybe Tom's
> function helps.
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Tom Short <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in something like that, too. I only want to rerun parts of
>> calculations if functions change or if input data has changed. Here's what
>> I came up with to check functions:
>>
>> https://github.com/tshort/Make.jl/blob/master/src/Make.jl#L43-L49
>>
>> It's probably not right but it's working reasonably well for me, at least
>> for anonymous functions. Changes in Julia v0.5 will probably change this.
>> I'm currently wrestling with how to maintain some state between Julia
>> sessions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Julia Tylors <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> to check whether they are equal so that i don't need to make them go
>>> through another of my operations to save time. That way it will be cached.
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 12:16:18 PM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Julia Tylors <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This was a nice question,
>>>>> i think i am trying to figure out a way to check if 2 functions
>>>>> (partial possibly) are  at the same syntactic location in the AST and 
>>>>> their
>>>>> free variables refer to the equal/same data
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 12:02:30 PM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you trying to discover about these functions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Julia Tylors <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't there a trick like i can serialize a partial function and then
>>>>>>> check their equality in the serialized form?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 11:22:37 AM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Functions are compared by identity – they are equal if they are the
>>>>>>>> same function, and not otherwise. Comparing functions syntactically is
>>>>>>>> shallow and nearly useless. Comparing functions by what they compute is
>>>>>>>> undecidable. So identity is essentially the only useful way to compare
>>>>>>>> functions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Julia Tylors <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a simple question. I like to compare functions. For example:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> function some_func(x::Target, y::Config, z::Int64)
>>>>>>>>>    #some code here
>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #some partialization here
>>>>>>>>> f1 = (x::Target,y::Config) -> some_func(x,y,5)
>>>>>>>>> f2 = (x::Target,y::Config) -> some_func(x,y,4)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I want to evaluate the following expression:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> f1 == f2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to