Cool. Thanks for being persistent! I guess it can help with your original problem since now you know it's possible :) It might give you some confidence that once you address the issues raised by Tim, and if you subsequently still do not get a performance boost, then you can think more about why your original problem is not compute-bound.
Sam On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 12:46:58 AM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: > > Dear Sam, > now the timing looks more optimistic, > > 111.858195 seconds (31.43 k allocations: 1.442 MB, 0.00% gc time) > 267.895365 seconds > verification succeeded > > I have about 2.5-folds speed-up with threads, which is better. It did not > help me with my original problem though. > Nevertheless, thank you very much for discussion. > Best wishes, > Tomas > >
