Yes, this is a good example – I reopened the issue because we should do it.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Jérémy Béjanin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 5:49:05 PM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > >> >> You're writing the same matrix location each time so the results are the >> same. >> > > Once again you are correct, the problem was with the python code and I was > confused because I had assumed it was right. > > Back to the original problem: > I understand that this issue would not occur too often, considering that a > serious algorithm would always use a sparse matrix (that's my next step!). > Are there actual use cases where it might be important to use the same > memory trick as Numpy? >
