>From my point of view both names are fine, both CppWrapper.jl and CxxWrapper.jl . It's your choice. Just go ahead!
I am waiting for this nice package to be registered. Uwe On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 2:17:12 PM UTC+1, Erik Schnetter wrote: > > The abbreviation "cpp" often stands for "C pre-processor". If you call > "cpp" on the command line, you'll get the preprocessor; only c++ or > cxx might get the C++ compiler. > > The name "CxxWrapper" might thus be better. > > -erik > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Bart Janssens <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to register the CppWrapper package: > > https://github.com/barche/CppWrapper > > > > At the very least, I'll have to rename the github repo to CppWrapper.jl, > but > > while I'm at it I'd like to ask if there are any suggestions for a > better > > name? The package is meant to "wrap" a C++ library in a set of Julia > > functions and types. Unlike Cxx.jl, there is no direct way to call C++ > > functions, but a C++ file has to be written and compiled into a shared > > library that can then be loaded using CppWrapper. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bart > > > > -- > Erik Schnetter <[email protected] <javascript:>> > http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ >
