Oh cool, thanks for the tips. I'll dive in and be back!

On Friday, 8 April 2016 08:18:17 UTC+1, DNF wrote:
>
> The xcorr function calls the conv function, which again uses fft. If you 
> know the general structure and length of your signals ahead of time, you 
> can probably gain some performance by planning the ffts beforehand. I don't 
> know why it doesn't work for you, but you could have a look in at conv in 
> dsp.jl.
>
> If you *really* want to speed things up, though, you might implement your 
> own xcorr.  xcorr dominates the runtime in your function, and if you know 
> an upper bound on the signal lags, you can implement xcorr with a limited 
> number of lags. By default xcorr calculates for all lags (in your case 
> that's 2*48000*60-1 ~ 6million lags). If you know that the max lag is 1 
> second, you can save ~98% percent of the runtime of xcorr.
>
> A couple of other remarks:
> * There's no need to put type annotations next to the function outputs, 
> it's just visual noise
> * Use ct_idx = cld(lₛ, 2) and forget about the mod.
>

Reply via email to