> I tested my loop monre than 2 times as it is written in my post and I have > always the same results. The function Tim Holy posted is much faster, I > posted the results above :)
I seem to recall that your example loop was not in a function(?) If so, that makes it lots slower. >> Probably you are doing this wrong; it shouldn't be allocating so much >> memory. Is your loop using global variables? Did you remember to time it >> twice (since the first time you call it there is compilation overhead.) >> Did you try the function Tim Holy posted? >>
