On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 10:38:28 AM UTC-4, Didier Verna wrote: > > > Julia warns you when there's an ambiguity in method specificity, and > picks one "arbitrarily" (according to the manual). I guess arbitrarily > doesn't mean random. Is there a particular reason for not > standardizing a tie-breaker (possibly the one currently in use) ? >
Because any practical tie-breaker rules are probably too complicated to be useful?
