Yeah, I see the point. I guess it'll be left to the developer to care for, then.
On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:12:27 PM UTC+2, Michael Borregaard wrote: > > > There are many cases where it is convenient to be able to give 0 kwargs. > Is it not better to test for > isempty(a) > when the behavior is undefined for 0 arguments? >
