Thanks Greg! These recommendations worked great.

Dominique, thanks for pointing out your operator infrastructure! Your lazy 
evaluation protocol is exactly what I need...

Madeleine

On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:36:57 AM UTC-7, Dominique Orban wrote:
>
> I have a whole operator infrastructure here: 
> https://github.com/JuliaOptimizers/LinearOperators.jl (develop branch) 
> but I've never tried SVD. It should work with normest & co. as all that's 
> required is matvecs.
>
> On Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:17:32 PM UTC-4, Madeleine Udell wrote:
>>
>> Hi, 
>>
>> I'm trying to define my own custom operator type that will allow me to 
>> implement my own * and '* operations for use inside eigenvalue or singular 
>> value routines like eigs and svds. But I'm having trouble making this work.
>>
>> Here's a simple example reimplementing matrix multiplication, with 
>> questions sprinkled as comments in the code.
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> import Base: *, Ac_mul_b, size
>> # Ac_mul_b doesn't seem to live in base; where does it live?
>>
>> type MyOperator
>> A::Array{Float64}
>> end
>>
>> o = MyOperator(randn(5,4))
>>
>> *(o::MyOperator, v::AbstractVector) = (println("using custom * method"); 
>> o.A*v)
>> o*rand(4) # this works
>>
>> Ac_mul_b(o::MyOperator, v::AbstractVector) = (println("using custom '* 
>> method"); o.A'*b)
>> o'*rand(5) # this doesn't work; instead, it calls ctranspose(o)*v, which 
>> is not what I want
>>
>> size(o::MyOperator) = size(o.A)
>> size(o::MyOperator, i::Int) = size(o)[i]
>>
>> svds(o, nsv=1)
>> # this doesn't work; svds requires a `zero` method for the parametrized 
>> type of my operator. If I know the type will always be Float64, what's the 
>> easiest way to tell this to svds?
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> Questions, collected:
>> 1. Ac_mul_b doesn't seem to live in base; where does it live? Or should I 
>> be extending a different function? This causes o'*v to call 
>> ctranspose(o)*v, which is not what I want. (The default ctranspose for new 
>> types seems to be the identity.)
>> 2. svds requires a `zero` method for the parametrized type of my 
>> operator. If I know the type will always be Float64, what's the easiest way 
>> to tell this to svds? Here's the eigs/svds 
>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/base/linalg/arnoldi.jl> 
>> code, but I haven't been able to track down enough information on 
>> AbstractMatrices and parametrized types to make this work.
>> 3. Any other methods I should implement for my operator?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Madeleine
>>
>

Reply via email to