That command line in build_sysimg.jl:77 looks strange. Actually I
can't find that line anywhere; our build_sysimg and BuildExecutable.jl
now have something slightly different.

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Tom Breloff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, I think there's even fewer people that are experts on the Windows
> build process.  I think the community tends to be more linux/osx focused.
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Lobinger <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello colleague,
>>
>> this topic is still seen as experimental and not that many of julia users
>> could be considered expert on this...
>> If the recipe given (long time ago i tried to follow this on a linux
>> installation which i general has more tooling to get shared libraries and
>> compilation working...) doesn't work, you could raise a concrete issue on
>> github - there you get more audience with julia internal know-how.
>>
>> Wishing a happy day,
>>
>>        Andreas
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 6, 2016 at 8:51:47 AM UTC+2, Ján Adamčák wrote:
>>>
>>> Nobody???
>>>
>>> Dňa pondelok, 2. mája 2016 11:30:11 UTC+2 Ján Adamčák napísal(-a):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Trying to create an executable from Julia source, there are questions
>>>> that raised... The process of exporting functions wasn't successful,
>>>> function(s) was not exported to dll, and even the generated dll cant be
>>>> loaded in c++ code. Below is the process explained in details:
>>>>
>>>> Can anybody bring more insight, how to build a standalone executable
>>>> from Julia source?
>>>>
>

Reply via email to