Thanks Michael, the behavior you mentioned in 0.5 is what I've expected: adding to docstrings using one double quotes pair shall add docstring after previous method for given function, which is inside three double quotes pair.
On 12 May 2016 at 13:42, Michael Hatherly <[email protected]> wrote: > The ordering of docstrings in Julia 0.4 is based on the method > signatures, which can sometimes not be all that obvious. They > are not printed in a random order though. It’s best just to not > rely on a specific order in 0.4. > > In 0.5 this order has been changed, > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/15266, > to the definition order of the docstrings, which should be much > less surprising. > > — Mike > On Thursday, 12 May 2016 10:23:16 UTC+2, Igor Cerovsky wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Trying to write documentation according to Julia manual I've found >> following reversed order of methods for given function; is that a bug?: >> """ >> foo() >> >> I'm major foo... >> """ >> function foo() >> end >> >> " >> foo(x) >> >> Here comes additional doc... >> " >> function foo(x) >> end >> >> resulting documentation looks like: >> help?> foo >> foo(x) >> >> Here comes additional doc... >> >> foo() >> >> I'm major foo... >> >> >> >>
