Yes, there was an error. Scott Jones helped me fix it. I am working with Randy to make sure the updated version is the one that's re-blogged. Sorry for the error!
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 1:14:44 PM UTC-7, Andre Bieler wrote: > > "Switching Float to Int in `test2()` makes the vector of arrays faster > than `test1()` and `test*3*()`" that is in my previous post. sorry for > the typo... > > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 4:08:52 PM UTC-4, Andre Bieler wrote: >> >> I am somewhat confused. >> >> When reading the blog post on: >> >> >> http://www.juliabloggers.com/using-julias-type-system-for-hidden-performance-gains/ >> >> >> the first benchmark says that: "*Notice that the vector of matrices is >> 300x slower on an i7 computer.*" >> Note that the Matrices in this vector (`test2()`) are holding elements of >> type float, while for the other (`test1()`, `test3()`) it is ints. >> >> Switching Float to Int in `test2()` makes the vector of arrays faster >> than `test1()` and `test2()`. Which is consistent with the findings of the >> same author in his original blog post. >> >> >> http://www.stochasticlifestyle.com/using-julias-type-system-hidden-performance-chunkedarrays-growablearrays-ellipsisnotation/ >> >> <http://www.stochasticlifestyle.com/using-julias-type-system-hidden-performance-chunkedarrays-growablearrays-ellipsisnotation/> >> >> sooo...? :) >> >> this is on julia 0.4.5 for my own benchmarks, which agree with the >> results from the second link. >> >
