That's what I was afraid of. It comes that Julia is very strongly tied to its library. I was hoping that it would be like with most other languages, for example C++. I mean C++ know about basic types and how to work with them (and much more) even without the standard library.
понедельник, 6 июня 2016 г., 21:17:16 UTC+4 пользователь Stefan Karpinski написал: > > Really useless – it doesn't know about integers or how add them, for > example. If you want to trim down the standard library, you can try editing > out parts of base/sysimg.jl and rebuilding, but that's kind of a tricky > process. > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Avik Sengupta <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Julia is pretty useless without its standard library. >> >> On Monday, 6 June 2016 14:42:02 UTC+1, Dmitry wrote: >>> >>> I tried to remove ".jl" library files from Julia installation directory, >>> but it did not help. Then I tried to remove "libjulia.dll" but it does not >>> want to run without this file. >>> >> >
